Letter Frequency Counter
See how often each letter appears, ranked and charted.
A readability grade based on characters rather than syllables.
Developed for the US Air Force in 1967 so readability could be calculated by a machine that could count keystrokes but not syllables. That makes it exactly reproducible.
—
US school grade level
Your longest sentences
The Automated Readability Index counts characters rather than estimating syllables, which makes it fully reproducible — two implementations always agree on the same text, which is not true of any syllable-based formula. It returns a US grade level.
Every syllable-based readability formula has the same weakness: syllable counts are estimated by rule, and the rules get English wrong often enough to move a score. The Automated Readability Index avoids that entirely by counting characters, which is exact.
It was developed in 1967 for the US Air Force, specifically so that readability could be calculated automatically by a typewriter that could count keystrokes but had no idea what a syllable was. That constraint turned out to be a strength: ARI is fully reproducible, and two implementations will always agree on the same text, which is not true of any syllable-based formula. It returns a US grade level like Flesch-Kincaid, and the two usually land within a grade of each other.
Characters are counted exactly, so the score is identical wherever it is calculated.
Characters per word and words per sentence, both measured rather than approximated.
Shown side by side, with the disagreement explained when the two diverge.
Letters and digits only, with punctuation and whitespace excluded as the specification requires.
Built for a typewriter that could count keystrokes but not syllables — which is why it works this way.
At least a hundred words for a meaningful result.
A US school grade, comparable to Flesch-Kincaid.
Characters per word and words per sentence, both counted exactly rather than estimated.
Where ARI and Flesch-Kincaid disagree, the text usually has short words with many syllables, or the reverse.
Because character counts are exact and syllable counts are estimates. Every syllable-based formula uses a rule that misjudges some English words, so two tools can disagree on the same text. ARI cannot.
4.71 times the average characters per word, plus 0.5 times the average words per sentence, minus 21.43. The result is a US grade level.
They usually land within a grade of each other. ARI tends to run slightly higher on text with long but simple words, since it cannot tell that "grandmother" is easier than its length suggests.
No. ARI counts only letters and digits, so punctuation and whitespace are excluded from the character total, which is how the original specification defines it.
What people who use the Automated Readability Index think of it. Reviews come from visitors and are posted as written.
No ratings yet
Yours would be the first.
0 reviews
Newest first
No reviews yet
Be the first to rate the Automated Readability Index. It takes half a minute and no account.
Write the first reviewSee how often each letter appears, ranked and charted.
Generate placeholder paragraphs, sentences or words for your mockups.
Rank single words, pairs and triples by how often they appear.
Cycle text through every case format from one box.
Count spaces, tabs, line breaks and the invisible ones too.
Replace emoji with their names, shortcodes, or nothing at all.
Pull @mentions and handles out of posts and threads.
Count consonants in any text and see which letters dominate.