Google Review Link Generator
Build the short link that opens your review box directly.
Compare two pages and find the passages they share.
The Duplicate Content Checker compares two pieces of content using overlapping word sequences rather than a crude word count, reports a similarity percentage, and highlights the passages that appear in both. It is clear that duplicate content is not penalised — what happens is that Google picks one version and drops the rest.
Paste two pieces of content and the checker measures how much they share, using overlapping word sequences rather than a crude word count. The passages that appear in both are highlighted in place, so you can see exactly where the duplication is.
It is worth being precise about what duplicate content does. There is no duplicate content penalty, and Google has said so repeatedly. What happens instead is quieter and often worse: Google picks one version to index and drops the others, and the one it picks may not be the one you wanted. Two near-identical location pages, or a category page whose text is repeated across every variant, end up competing with each other for the same query and neither wins. This tool tells you how close two pages are; what you do about it is a canonical, a rewrite, or a merge.
Overlapping word sequences catch reordered and lightly reworded copy that a word count misses.
The exact runs that appear in both are shown, so you know what to rewrite.
Paste raw markup and the comparison runs on the readable text, not the tags.
What only appears in one side is separated out, which is what makes each page worth keeping.
No penalty myth — it explains that the real cost is Google choosing for you.
Plain text or HTML — tags are stripped before the comparison.
The other page, template output or draft you want to compare it against.
Shown as a percentage, with the shared passages listed and highlighted.
Rewrite, canonicalise or merge, depending on whether both pages need to exist.
No. Google has said so many times. What actually happens is that Google chooses one version to index and filters the others out of results, and it may not choose the one you wanted. The damage is dilution, not punishment.
There is no threshold Google publishes. As a working rule, two pages sharing most of their substantive text will be treated as the same page, and two pages sharing boilerplate but differing in their real content will not. If you cannot explain why both need to exist, that is the answer.
Common in ecommerce and usually handled with canonicals to a single main version, or by writing enough unique text around the shared description to make each page substantially different. Manufacturer descriptions copied verbatim across a whole market are the classic case of pages that rank for nothing.
No, and nothing that runs in a browser could. It compares two pieces of text you supply. For checking against the web you need a service with an index of it, which is a fundamentally different tool.
What people who use the Duplicate Content Checker think of it. Reviews come from visitors and are posted as written.
No ratings yet
Yours would be the first.
0 reviews
Newest first
No reviews yet
Be the first to rate the Duplicate Content Checker. It takes half a minute and no account.
Write the first reviewBuild the short link that opens your review box directly.
Check JSON-LD for syntax errors and missing required fields.
Strip tracking parameters from a list of URLs in one pass.
Check which URLs your robots.txt actually allows and blocks.
Write a valid ads.txt so your ad inventory is not spoofed.
Single reviews and aggregate ratings as valid JSON-LD.
Check description length in pixels and spot the ones Google will cut.
Build a map embed that does not slow the page down.