Skip to content

LLM Model Comparison

Compare GPT, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek and Llama by price, context and monthly cost.

Quick Tool Overview

The LLM Model Comparison table lines up models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, Mistral and hosted Llama by context window, output limit and token prices, then calculates the per-request and monthly cost of your own traffic for each one.

What it does
Compares LLM prices and limits side by side
You give it
Your monthly requests and tokens per request
You get back
A sortable table with your monthly cost per model
Best for
Choosing a model and forecasting an API budget
AI Tools Free, unlimited use No sign-up Runs in your browser

About the LLM Model Comparison

Model pricing pages list a price per million input tokens and a different one for output, which makes comparing providers harder than it should be: a model that is cheap to read can be expensive to write, and the one that wins depends entirely on the shape of your requests.

This table puts current models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, DeepSeek, Mistral and hosted Llama side by side with their context window, maximum output, input and output prices. Enter your own traffic — requests a month, tokens in and tokens out per request — and every row gains a per-request and a monthly cost, so the ranking reflects your workload rather than a headline rate.

Filter by provider, minimum context window or reasoning models, and sort by monthly cost, input price, output price or window size. Prices change often, so treat the figures as a starting point and confirm them on the provider pricing page; batch APIs and prompt caching can cut the real bill substantially.

Key features of the LLM Model Comparison

Costs for your workload

Input and output prices are applied to your own traffic, not a headline rate.

Filter and sort

By provider, minimum context window, reasoning models, price or monthly cost.

Cheapest match highlighted

The lowest monthly cost is marked, with how many times cheaper it is than the dearest.

Output-heavy hints

Tells you when output price will dominate your bill.

Transparent prices

List prices are shown as a starting point with a clear reminder to confirm them.

How to use the LLM Model Comparison

  1. 1

    Describe your traffic

    Requests per month, and the typical input and output tokens of each request.

  2. 2

    Filter the models

    Narrow by provider, minimum context window, or reasoning models only.

  3. 3

    Sort the table

    By monthly cost to find the cheapest, or by context window or output length.

  4. 4

    Shortlist and test

    Take the cheapest few that fit, and run them against your own examples before switching.

Frequently asked questions

Generating a token requires a full pass through the model for each one, while input tokens are processed together in parallel. Providers price output several times higher to match.

Reviews of the LLM Model Comparison

What people who use the LLM Model Comparison think of it. Reviews come from visitors and are posted as written.

No ratings yet

Yours would be the first.

  • 5 0 reviews rated 5 stars
  • 4 0 reviews rated 4 stars
  • 3 0 reviews rated 3 stars
  • 2 0 reviews rated 2 stars
  • 1 0 reviews rated 1 star

Write a review

Used this tool? Your rating helps the next person decide.

Your rating

Plain text only — links, email addresses and HTML are not accepted. Your name and review are shown publicly; nothing else is collected. See the privacy policy.

0 reviews

Newest first

No reviews yet

Be the first to rate the LLM Model Comparison. It takes half a minute and no account.

Write the first review

More AI tools