CIDR Range Calculator
Work out a subnet: network, broadcast, host range and usable count.
Check an email address against the rules that actually matter, and see why.
The Email Format Validator checks each rule individually instead of running one huge regular expression, so a failure comes with a specific reason — and it flags the things that matter in practice, not just syntax.
Email validation is usually done with one enormous regular expression that is either too strict or too loose. This checks the rules individually instead, so a failure comes with a reason rather than a bare rejection.
It checks the parts separately: the local part's length and its rules about full stops, the domain's labels and hyphens, the top-level domain, and the total length. Beyond syntax it flags what actually matters in practice — known disposable-address providers, likely typos of the common mail domains, addresses on the reserved documentation domains, and plus-addressing, which is legal and which a surprising number of forms wrongly reject.
Leading dots, double dots, over-length local parts and bad domain labels are each reported as themselves.
gmial.com, hotmial.com and the rest are flagged with what they were probably meant to be.
Known throwaway providers are identified, and the decision about whether to block them is left to you.
It is entirely legal, widely used, and wrongly rejected by a surprising number of forms — so it is noted rather than failed.
With the domain lower-cased, which is how an address should be stored and compared.
One address, or a list to check in bulk.
Each rule is checked separately and reported with its reason.
Disposable providers and likely typos are flagged separately from syntax errors.
With the domain lower-cased, which is how addresses should be stored.
No, and nothing except sending to it can prove that. Format validation catches typos and nonsense; delivery confirms existence.
Because it is entirely legal and widely used — ada+shop@example.com reaches ada@example.com. Forms that reject it are wrong, and it is worth knowing yours might be tested with one.
Because the RFC grammar allows quoted local parts, comments and IP-literal domains, so a fully correct pattern is unusable — and a simplified one rejects valid addresses with no explanation of why.
It depends what they cost you. For a free trial, probably. For a newsletter, blocking them annoys people using a legitimate privacy tool. The tool flags them and leaves the decision to you.
What people who use the Email Format Validator think of it. Reviews come from visitors and are posted as written.
No ratings yet
Yours would be the first.
0 reviews
Newest first
No reviews yet
Be the first to rate the Email Format Validator. It takes half a minute and no account.
Write the first reviewWork out a subnet: network, broadcast, host range and usable count.
Collapse nested JSON into one flat level of dot-notation or bracket keys.
Encrypt text with a password using AES-GCM, and decrypt it back.
Decode a JWT and read its header, claims and expiry in plain English.
See an IP address in binary, hex and decimal, octet by octet.
Check any number against the Luhn checksum and see the working.
Compare two files side by side and export a unified diff.
Re-indent HTML without breaking whitespace-sensitive elements.